No anticipatory bail to applicant who used proxies to obtain registration with fraudulent documents: HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 18 February, 2023
Case Details: Bal Mukund Vaishnav v. State of Maharashtra - [2023] 147 taxmann.com 309 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- M.S. Karnik, J.
- Brijesh Pathak for the Applicant.
- S.V. Gavand & PI Preetam S.B. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The applicant filed an application for anticipatory bail before the High Court of Bombay. In the instant case, the GST department noticed something suspicious about the working of a company and conducted enquiry. During enquiry, it was found that the applicant was allegedly controlling whole affairs with two directors in front who are cylinder delivery boy and welder. The department filed FIR against the applicant for offences under Section 132 of GST Act, 2017.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the allegation against the applicant was that it had produced fraudulent documents while obtaining the registration. Moreover, the owner of premises had given statement that he had never given the premises on lease and license or on rent and the NOC which was submitted did not bear his signature. The department also submitted that the applicant had not co-operated with the investigation. Therefore, the Court held that this was not a fit case to grant relief of pre-arrest bail to the applicant and anticipatory bail application was rejected.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied