No Advance Ruling can be sought to determine GST rate after receipt of SCN: Madras HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 27 June, 2022
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Saisanket Enterprise v. Authority for Advance Ruling, Commissioner Commercial Tax, Madhya Pradesh - [2022] 139 taxmann.com 470 (Madhya Pradesh)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Vivek Rusia & Amar Nath Kesharwani, JJ.
- Ajay Bagadia & Tarang Chelawat, Advs. for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was works contractor engaged in executing works related to construction of irrigation dam. The premises of petitioner was searched by authorities and evasion of GST was detected. A show cause notice was issued on petitioner calling upon to discharge GST liability at rate of 18% as applicable on works contract services.
After receipt of SCN, the petitioner approached to Authority for Advance Ruling contending that rate of taxes applicable to sub-contractor should be 12 % in view of Notification No. 11/2017 dated 22-8-2017. The Authority denied to grant the advance ruling and the petitioner approached Appellate Authority by way of filing an appeal. The Appellate Authority also dismissed the appeal and it filed writ petition against the same by submitting that no such proceedings were pending against the petitioner, therefore, Authority ought to have decided the issue raised by the petitioner regarding the applicability of the rate of tax.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that the petitioner approached to Authority for Advance Ruling after receipt of SCN. When issue was pending before Authority under GST Act, the Authorities had rightly declined to grant advance ruling as petitioner did not approach in advance before those Authorities for obtaining ruling. Thus, the Court dismissed the writ petition.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Order dated 10-12-2020 passed in case No. 14/2020 by Authority for Advance Ruling, M.P. (para 9)
- Order dated 26-7-2021 passed in case No. MP/AAAR/05/2021 by M.P. Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (para 9) – Affirmed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
