NFRA’s Interpretation on SA 200
- Blog|News|Account & Audit|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 5 November, 2022
“Auditor” is used to refer to the person or persons conducting the audit, usually the engagement partner (EP) or other members of the engagement team (ET), or, as applicable, the firm. Where an SA expressly intends that a requirement or responsibility be fulfilled by the engagement partner, then the term “engagement partner” rather than “auditor” is used. “Engagement partner” and “firm” are to be read as referring to their public sector equivalents where relevant.
Thus, the term ‘auditor’ includes other persons which are conducting the audit and are members of the firm. Engagement Quality Control Review (EQCR) team members also carry out the audit of the client and are members of the firm. The definition does not restrict the scope of term ‘auditor’ to only the ET. Further, the definition specifically intends that if a requirement or responsibility is to be fulfilled by the EP, the word “EP” is used. Hence, the SAs use the term “EP” or “EQCR” if it intends that as a requirement. Otherwise, the term “Auditor” is used. Therefore, the term “auditor” covers EQCR and SA 230 applies to the documentation of Engagement Quality Control Reviewer also.
The Audit Firm’s assertion that the auditing standards are “not prescriptive but are principle based” and it is not possible to make “extensive detailing in work papers on compliance with each para of the standards of auditing” is incorrect. Such an understanding and application of the standards of auditing goes against the fundamental and mandatory nature of the standards.
Click Here To Read The Full Story
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied