NCLT Dismisses Amalgamation Petition due to Non-Compliance with Companies Act and Shareholders’ Interests
- Blog|News|Company Law|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 19 July, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Vanraj Suppliers (P.) Ltd. (VSPL) v. Shree Shyam Tea (P.) Ltd. (SSTPL) - [2023] 152 taxmann.com 41 (NCLT-Guwahati)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Deep Chandra Joshi, Judicial Member & Prasanta Kumar Mohanty, Technical Member
- Neha Somani, CS for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the petitioner (i.e. Transferor Company) filed an application under section 232(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 seeking approval of the amalgamation scheme with the respondent (i.e. Transferee Company) and their respective shareholders.
In the application for amalgamation, it had been stated that Shareholders of the Petitioner Companies had given their written consents by way of affidavits and, copies of the said affidavits had been annexed with the company application.
The Chartered Accountants of the transferee company submitted that the accounting treatment proposed in the Scheme of Amalgamation was in conformity with the Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 and in compliance with the proviso to section 230(7) of the Companies Act, 2013.
It was noted that the RBI, through its press release, had cancelled the registration certificate of the transferor company. Further, it was noted that the cancellation of license of the transferor company by the RBI and the shifting of the company from one State to another just after the cancellation of the license was not brought to the notice of the instant Tribunal during the first motion of hearing.
NCLT Held
The NCLT held that since publishing an advertisement in widely circulated newspapers in both States was required in the interest of all stakeholders, the statutory requirement of sections 230 and 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 had not been complied with.
Therefore, the proposed scheme of amalgamation of companies was not to be sanctioned in the interest of all shareholders. Hence, the petition was to be dismissed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
