NCLT admits petition filed u/s 7 on existence of debt and its default in repayment by corporate debtor
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 19 July, 2021
Case details: Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. v. Meeti Developers (P.) Ltd. - [2021] 128 taxmann.com 137 (NCLT - Mum.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Smt. Suchitra Kanuparthi | Judicial Member and Chandra Bhan Singh | Technical Member
- V.R. Dhond, Adv. for the Petitioner
- Akshay Petkar, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the given case, the Petitioner viz. ‘Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited’ (hereinafter as Financial Creditors) has furnished Form No. 1 under rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 in the capacity of “Financial Creditor” by invoking the provisions of section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against ‘Meeti Developers Private Limited’ (hereinafter as ‘Corporate Debtor’).
n the requisite Form, under the head “Particulars of Financial Debt” the total amount of Debt granted is stated to be Rs. 55,00,00,000/-, and the amount claimed to be in default is Rs. 71,32,09,849/- including interest.
NCLT Held
During submission by both parties, the NCLT understood that the Corporate Debtor has defaulted in repayment of debt. And has acknowledged the disbursement of credit facilities and its liability to repay the same. However, the Corporate Debtor failed to pay. Hence, owing to the inability of the Corporate Debtor to pay its dues, this is a fit case to be moved u/s 7 of the I&B Code.
Moreover, the NCLT stated that the nature of Debt is a “Financial Debt” as defined under section 5(8) of the Code. It has also been established that there is a “Default” as defined under section 3(12) of the Code on the part of the Debtor. The two essential qualifications, i.e. existence of ‘debt’ and ‘default’, for admission of a petition under section 7 of the I&B Code, have been met in this case. Hence, this Petition deserves to be admitted.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied