NCLAT Rightly Upheld AA’s Order Rejecting Stay of Auction as Appellant Couldn’t Submit Compromise Scheme Within Time

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 11 October, 2023

Compromise Scheme

Case Details: Bankey Bihari Infrahomes (P.) Ltd. v. Alok Kumar Kuchchal - [2023] 154 taxmann.com 516 (SC)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Sanjay Kishan Kaul & Manoj Misra, JJ.
  • Abhimanyu Bhandari, Adv., Ms Rooh-e-hina Dua, AOR, Pranav Gupta & Harshit Khanduja, Advs. for the Appellant. 
  • Sumeer Sodhi, AOR, Devashish TiwariAkshay Sharma, Advs., Mritunjay Kumar Sinha, AOR, Sameer RohtagiKartikeya SinghRukban TyagiMs Snehal Sharda, Advs., Alok Kumar KuchhalPulkit Deora, Adv., Pranay Maheshwari, Dr Amardeep GaurPardeep Kumar Gupta, Advs., Aadil Singh BoparaiMs Srishti Khanna, Advs. & Nar Singh, AOR for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the CIRP was initiated against the corporate debtor by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) on an application filed under section 7 of the IBC. After the unsuccessful completion of CIRP, the NCLT ordered for liquidation of the corporate debtor and the respondent was appointed as the Liquidator.

The appellants filed an application u/s 60(5) before the NCLT seeking direction to the RP to place a scheme of compromise and arrangement submitted by the appellants under section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013. However, the said application was disposed of by the NCLT directing the liquidator to consider a scheme of compromise and arrangement submitted by the appellants within three weeks i.e., till 4-5-2022.

Thereafter, the liquidator published a public announcement to initiate the auction process of the corporate debtor’s assets. Since, the liquidator continued with the auction process, the appellants filed an application before the NCLT seeking a stay of the auction process.

However, the NCLT rejected the said application on the ground that the appellants neither submitted the scheme of compromise and arrangement within the stipulated time i.e., 4-5-2022 nor did they inform the liquidator about the delay in submitting the scheme or requested any extension of the time limit from the NCLT.

Aggrieved by the NCLT’s order, the appellants filed an application before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The NCLAT by the impugned order stated that the NCLT provided reasonable and sufficient opportunity to the appellants to submit a credible scheme of compromise and arrangement and, therefore, the appeal filed by the appellants was to be dismissed.

Supreme Court Held

Thereafter, the appellants filed an instant appeal before the Supreme Court. It was noted that the bottom line to submit payment under the scheme had not been brought in as assured on the last date. Therefore, an instant appeal filed against the order of the NCLAT was to be dismissed.

List of Cases Reviewed

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied