Mere undervaluation of goods is not sufficient ground to detain goods or vehicle: HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 18 April, 2022
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Karnataka Traders v. State of Gujarat - [2022] 137 taxmann.com 18 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- J.B. Pardiwala and Ms. Nisha M. Thakore, JJ.
- Samir Gupta, Adv. and Monal S. Chaglani for the Petitioner.
- Utkarsh Sharma, AGP for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a registered dealer under the GST. It sent a consignment of goods which was intercepted by the department while it was travelling to different direction than direction of destination. The department issued Form GST MOV – 02 to conduct physical verification/inspection of the conveyance, goods and documents. No discrepancy was noted by the proper officer with regard to the description of goods as per invoice and conveyance nor any anomaly found with regard to quantity as per invoice and physical verification undertaken by the concerned officer. The only discrepancy found was that there was under valuation of goods and goods were confiscated. It filed petition against the same.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that mere change of route without anything more would not necessarily be sufficient to draw an inference that the intention was to evade tax. It was also noted that mere undervaluation of goods also by itself was not sufficient to detain goods and vehicle as it is a settled legal position that undervaluation cannot be a ground for seizure of goods in transit by the inspecting authority. Therefore, it was held that confiscation proceedings were liable to be quashed.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- K.P. Sugandh Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh [2020] 122 taxmann.com 291 (Chhattisgarh) (para 10)
- Podaran Foods India (P.) Ltd. v. State of Kerala [2021] 123 taxmann.com 282 (Ker.) (para 11)
- Kannangayathu Metals v. Asstt. STO [2020] 113 taxmann.com 176 (Ker.) (para 11).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
