Look Out Notice Against Auditor for Owing Huge Debt to Banks can’t be Quashed

  • Blog|News|Company Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 24 June, 2023

Recent Posts

News, Blog, Account & Audit

Impact of Deferred Tax on the Right of Return of Goods – Ind AS 12

Blog, Advisory, Company Law

[Analysis] SEBI Board Meeting Highlights [Dec. 2024] – Stricter Norms for SME IPOs | Use of AI Tools | Expansion of the UPSI Definition

Latest from Taxmann

Look out circular

Case Details: Ghanshyam Pandey v. Union of India - [2023] 151 taxmann.com 27 (Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Prathiba M. Singh, J.
    • Balaji Subramanian, Pawan Bhushan & Akash Kundu, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC, Kritgya Kumar Kait, GP, Shriram Tiwary, Abhigyau Siddhanta, Salman Razi, Advs., Gaurav, (A.D. SFIO) & Nitin Agnihotri for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, an investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) was initiated against individual/entity ‘S.’ The investigation uncovered connections between the transactions of ‘S’ and foreign entities, specifically its affiliated companies.

Further, it was revealed that a significant sum of money had been transferred to these related companies, resulting in outstanding loans owed to public financial institutions and banks.

Later, the SFIO issued a look out circular (LOC) against petitioner i.e, a whole-time director and a member of audit committee of ‘S’. Consequently, the Petitioner filed instant petition praying for quashing of said LOC issued against him.

Subsequently, it was found that petitioner was a CEO of ‘S’ between 2006-2012, a whole-time director of ‘S’ from 2013 to 2017 and a member of audit committee from 2011 to 2017, during which transactions claimed by SFIO to be fraudulent transactions had occurred.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the petitioner being an auditor was not to be absolved of responsibility merely on ground that he was a mute spectator of shortcomings or misconduct within company and, thus, LOC was not liable to be quashed.

List of Cases Reviewed

    • Brij Bhushan Kathuria v. Union of India 2021 SCC OnLine Delhi 2587
    • Lakshmi Satyanarayana Dutt Tadikond v. Union of India [2020] 114 taxmann.com 424/274 Taxman 414/426 ITR 550 (Delhi)
    • Sumer Singh Salkha v. Asstt. Director ILR (2010) 6 Delhi 706
    • Rana Ayyub v. Union of India 2022 SCC Online Delhi 961 (para 26) distinguished.

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied