ITC would be available on invisible loss of inputs caused during manufacturing process: HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 24 December, 2021
Case Details: R.K. Ganapathy Chettiar v. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Kangeyam - [2021] 133 taxmann.com 259 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel details
-
- Dr. Anita Sumanth, J.
- R.L. Ramani, Sr. Counsel and B. Raveendran for the Petitioner.
- T.M.C. Kaushik, Government Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in the manufacturing activity and there was a loss of a small portion of the inputs, inherent to the manufacturing process. The order was issued by the department to reverse a portion of the ITC claimed by the petitioners, proportionate to the loss of the input, referring to the provisions of Section 17(5) (h) of the GST Act. It challenged the order for reversal of ITC and filed writ petition.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that impugned assessment orders rejected a portion of ITC claimed. But the situations as set out in clause (h) of Section 17(5) indicate loss of inputs that are quantifiable, and involve external factors or compulsions. A loss that is occasioned by consumption in the process of manufacture is one which is inherent to the process of manufacture itself. The reversal of ITC by invoking Section 17(5) (h) by the revenue, in cases of loss by consumption of input inherent to manufacturing loss was misconceived. Therefore, it was held that ITC would be available on total quantity and value of inputs that went into making of final product and order was liable to be set aside.
Case Review
-
- ARS Steels & Alloy International (P.) Ltd. v. State Tax Officer [2021] 127 taxmann.com 787/86 GST 644 (Mad.) (para 2) followed.
List of Cases referred to
-
- Rupa & Co. Ltd. v. CESTAT 2015 (324) E.L.T. 295 (Mad.) (para 1)
- ARS Steels and Alloy International (P.) Ltd. v. State Tax Officer [2021] 127 taxmann.com 787/86 GST 644 (Mad.) (para 1)
- Saradhambika Paper & Board Mills (P.) Ltd. v. State Tax Officer [W.P.No. 590 of 2021, dated 30-6-2021.] (para 1).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied