ITC Can’t be Denied Due to Discrepancies in GSTR-2A Without Proof of Collusion Between Assessee and Seller | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 22 September, 2023
Case Details: Diya Agencies v. State Tax Officer - [2023] 154 taxmann.com 421 (Kerala)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.
- Aji V. Dev, H. Abdul Lathief, Alan Priyadarshi Dev & S. Sajeevan, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Smt. Jasmine M.M. GP, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the petitioner’s claim for input tax credit (ITC) had been denied on ground that invoices were not shown in GSTR-2A as taxpayers were only eligible for ITC shown in GSTR-2A. It filed writ petition and contended that ITC could not be denied merely on ground of amount not mentioned in GSTR-2A for which petitioner did had any control.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that credit should not be denied unless collusion between assessee and seller is proved and genuineness of transaction has to be proved by assessee since burden to prove genuineness of transaction would be upon purchasing dealer. In instant case, the petitioner had to discharge burden of proof regarding remittance of tax to seller by providing evidence.
Therefore, the Court held that the denial of ITC merely on ground that in Form GSTR-2A said tax was not reflected to petitioner was not sustainable and matter was to be remanded back. Also, the Court directed Revenue to give opportunity to petitioner to give evidence in respect of his claim for Input Tax Credit.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied