ITAT quashes assessee-in-default order for failure to furnish Form 15G/15H of small farmers
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 March, 2022
Case Details: Saptagiri Grameena Bank v. ITO - [2022] 136 taxmann.com 84 (Hyderabad - Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial Member and Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member
- Sanjeev Aditya for the Appellant.
- Rohit Mujumdar for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee was a Regional Rural Bank and was assessable as a cooperative society. During the course of survey proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee had not submitted form 15G/15H filed by the investors of F.D./Term deposit along with complete relevant details of depositors such as the name of the depositor, amount of FD, deposit date, maturity date or interest rate, etc.
AO held assessee as assessee in default for payment of interest without deduction of tax at source and raised demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A). On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO. Aggrieved-AO filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that it was noted in assessee’s own case for another assessment year observed that assessee complied with section 197A considering facts that assessee had collected above 75 per cent of Forms and percentage of Forms not submitted compared to total interest disbursal by the assessee was just 2.26 per cent.
Further, the assessee was in a banking business operating as Regional Rural Bank (RRB). Its main customers are agriculturists and small farmers. The majority of the interest payments were in the segment of Rs. 10,000 – 20,000 and Rs. 20,000 – 50,000.
Even otherwise, customers (farmers) received the interest at the extreme level group say Rs. 50,000/- the income will be automatically exempt due to the basic exemption level of income tax. Therefore, considering the facts of case, the order of AO holding assessee to be in default was to be set aside.
Case Review
-
- Saptagiri Grameena Bank v. Asstt. CIT [IT Appeal Nos. 815 & 1233 (Hyd.) of 2015, dated 6-5-2016] (para 10) followed.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Saptagiri Grameena Bank v. Asstt. CIT [IT Appeal Nos. 815 & 1233 (Hyd.) of 2015, dated 6-5-2016] (para 10).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied