Inordinate delay in filing an appeal against AA’s order for SAST violations without sufficient cause to be rejected: SAT
- Blog|News|Company Law|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 14 July, 2021
Case details: Jonaki Bakeri v. Securities and Exchange Board of India [2021] 128 taxmann.com 92 (SAT - Mumbai)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Tarun Agarwala | Presiding Officer and Justice M.T. Joshi | Judicial Member
- Somasekhar Sundaresan, Bijal H. Chhatrapati, Ms. Pulkit Sukhramani and Ms. Vidhi Jhawar, Advs. for the Appellant
- Kumar Desai, Adv., Abhiraj Arora and Ms. Rashi Dalmia, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
An appeal was filed by appellants against the order after a delay of 577 days, hence, an application for condoning delay had been filed.
In the instant case, the Appellants sought to condone delay on the ground that they were travelling and thus, it took some time to engage an advocate, procure documents and thereafter, to file an appeal.
SAT Held
The SAT noted that the ground that they were travelling was vague ground that had been asserted without any documentary evidence. Since no sufficient cause had been given to condone the delay, the application for condonation was to be rejected.
Case Review
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Tarun Jiwarajka v. SEBI [2018] 94 taxmann.com 348/148 SCL 65 (SAT – Mum.) (para 2)
- Prem Chand Bansal & Sons v. ITO [1999] 237 ITR 65 (Delhi) (para 3)
- Basawaraj v. Special Land Acquisition Officer [2013] 14 SCC 81 (para 6)
- Madanlal v. Shyamlal [2002] 1 SCC 535 (para 7)
- Balwant Singh v. Jagdish Singh [2010] 8 SCC 685 (para 8)
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied