Ignorance of Notification Could Not be a Ground for Extending Period of Limitation: HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 31 May, 2023
Case Details: Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs v. Delhi Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling - [2023] 150 taxmann.com 505 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Vibhu Bakhru & Amit Mahajan, JJ.
- Abhishek Kumar & Luv Kumar, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Rajeev Aggarwal, Ms Shilpa Singh, Manbhar Mittal, B.B. Devan, Sumit K. Batra & Manish Khurana, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee filed writ petition against the order passed by Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR), whereby its appeal against order passed by Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) was rejected on ground of limitation. It submitted that appeal was late filed since Appellate Authority was not constituted and it became aware of Notification constituting Appellate Authority in November, 2019.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the ignorance of Notification constituting Appellate Authority could not be a ground for extending period of limitation. Even if assessee became aware of Notification in November, 2019, it was required to file appeal at least within thirty days of becoming aware of constitution of Appellate Authority. But, it filed appeal on 14-2-2020 which was also beyond period of sixty days for condoning delay from date it become aware of constitution of Appellate Authority as stipulated in Proviso to section 100(2) of CGST Act. Therefore, the Court held that there was no fault in decision of Appellate Authority in declining to entertain appeal under section 100 of CGST Act and dismissed the petition.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied