ICAI Can Refer Matter to Disciplinary Committee If Board of Discipline Disagrees With Director’s Opinion | SC
- Blog|News|Account & Audit|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 13 February, 2024
The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of Rule 9(3)(b) of the Chartered Accountants’ (Procedure of Investigation of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007. The Rule allows the Board of Discipline to refer a matter to the Disciplinary Committee for further action under Chapter V of the Chartered Accountants’ (Procedure of Investigation of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, if it disagrees with the prima facie opinion of the Director (Discipline) under clause (a) above. The Appellant had argued that the Rule was ultra vires the parent Act, i.e., the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The contention was that the Rule went beyond the scope of the Act. The Court, however, disagreed with the contention and held that the Rule was completely in sync with the object and purpose of framing the Chapter on ‘Misconduct’ under the Act. The Court also noted that the Rule was necessary to ensure that a genuine complaint of professional misconduct against the member is not wrongly thrown out at the very threshold.
Click Here To Read The Full Story
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied