ICAI can initiate inquiry against PNB auditors in Nirav Modi Scam relying upon news reports: HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 22 December, 2022
Case Details: C.A. Sanjay Jain v. ICAI - [2022] 145 taxmann.com 483 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Yashwant Varma, J.
- Ms Sunita Sharma, Ms Radha Singh & Deepak Verma, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Ramji Srinivasan, Ms Pooja M. Saigal, Simrat Singh Pasay, Ms Shruti Pandey & Ms Megha Dugar, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has the authority to initiate an investigation against chartered accountants (CAs) on its own accord, based on “information” it receives, even if it does not receive a complaint.
High Court Held
The court stated that news reports cannot be considered “information” in and of themselves, but can prompt the ICAI to gather additional material that could be considered “information” for disciplinary proceedings against the CA in question.
Thus, where Suo Motu inquiry was initiated by ICAI in Nirav Modi Scam against CAs who were joint Statutory Auditors of Punjab National Bank and had submitted Limited Review Report in which they failed to disclose the Nirav Modi Scam of which they had knowledge at the time of reporting, the enquiry is not to be quashed as:
(i) It was not based solely on the news reports (which themselves contained no allegations against the petitioners-CAs);
(ii) The news reports merely acted as the trigger for the Institute to delve deeper into the massive fraud which had occurred and to examine whether any member had failed to abide by the SAs’ which applied; and
(iii) The inquiry was based on obtaining a response from petitioner CAs and after the Directorate scrutinized the Limited Review Report dealing with the quarterly results of PNB and undertook due examination of whether the petitioners had adhered to the Standards on Auditing (SAs) which applied.
Accordingly, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners-CAs shall stand dismissed. The Institute shall consequently be entitled to proceed further in accordance with law.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied