IBBI bars RP from taking an assignment for 1 year as he violated Sec. 208(2)(a) and Regulation 36A of CIRP regulations

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 8 September, 2021

Recent Posts

News, Blog, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Interim Moratorium Barred Continuation of Proceedings u/s 138 of NI Act Against Petitioner Due to IBC’s Overriding Effect | HC

Blog, News, FEMA & Banking

Borrower’s Right to Redeem Secured Asset Ends on Publication of Notice u/s 9(1) of SI Rules, Not After Sale Completion | SC

Latest from Taxmann

Insolvency Professional

Case details: Manish Kumar Gupta, In re - [2021] 129 taxmann.com 364 (IBBI)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Dr. Mukulita Vijayawargiya, Member

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, Mr. Manish Kumar Gupta (hereinafter referred to as ‘M’) was appointed as an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in a matter of corporate debtor.

The Insolvency Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) issued a show-cause notice to ‘M’ based on findings in the inspection report in respect of his role as an IRP/RP in CIRP of corporate debtor and material available on record alleging contraventions of provisions of section 208 and regulation 7 of IBBI (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016.

IBBI Held

The Disciplinary Committee of IBBI found that ‘M’ by the inclusion of expression of interest after the last date had contravened regulation 36A of CIRP Regulations, regulation 7(2)(h) of IP Regulations, and clauses 13 and 14 of Code of Conduct. It was also found that ‘M’ had contravened section 208(2)(a) and did not take reasonable care and exercised diligence while making disclosures as per Circular No. IP/005/2018, dated 16-1-2018.

Consequently, the Disciplinary Committee of IBBI was justified in directing that ‘M’ would not seek or accept any process or assignment or render any services under Code for a period of twelve months.

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied