High Court Rules Against Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration Due to Non-Filing of Returns
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 31 July, 2023
Case Details: Ashish Garg v. Assistant Commissioner of State Goods and Service Tax, Delhi - [2023] 152 taxmann.com 683 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Vibhu Bakhru & Amit Mahajan, JJ.
-
Abhishek Garg, Yash Gaiha & Ranesh Mankotia, Advs. for the Petitioner.
-
Rajeev Aggarwal, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the department issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why his registration should not be cancelled on the ground that he had not filed returns for a continuous period of six months. Thereafter, the order was passed cancelling registration from 02.07.2017.
He filed writ petition opposing cancellation of registration from retrospective effect and contended that it had already filed application for cancellation from 20.07.2019 which was rejected. It was also submitted that he could not reply to the said notice within the time as almost two years had elapsed since he had closed his business and the information as sought was not readily available.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that as per Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017, the concerned authority has discretion to cancel registration from a retrospective date, but this power cannot be exercised arbitrarily. There was no dispute that the petitioner had regularly filed his returns till 30.06.2019.
Since, the reason for proposing cancellation of petitioner’s GST registration as stated in SCN was non-filing of returns, the retrospective cancellation cannot extend to include earlier period for which returns were filed by assessee.
Therefore, it was held that the registration would be cancelled with effect from 30.06.2019 as there was no material on record to justify such retrospective cancellation of GST registration by the Adjudicating Authority.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied