HCs can’t interfere with CCI’s probe unless there is an abuse of process
- Blog|News|Competition Law|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 15 November, 2022
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: GMR Hyderabad lnternational Airport Ltd. v. Competition Commission of lndia - [2022] 144 taxmann.com 186 (HC-Telangana)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- K. Lakshman, J.
- S. Niranjan Reddy & Ms Rubaina S. Khatoon for the Petitioner.
- K. Vivek Reddy, Ms Neha Pandey, D. Prakash Reddy & P. Sriram for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, a question was raised before the High Court as to whether the Court can interfere in CCI proceedings and investigations when there appears to be an abuse of law?
The High Court observed that an order passed u/s 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002, directing investigation by the Director General is an administrative order passed only to determine whether allegations made by informant u/s 19(1), about possible violations of competition law are true.
It was further observed that once information is received u/s 19(1), CCI, based on material produced by the informant has to form a prima facie opinion regarding possible competition law violations. The High Court held that while forming a prima facie opinion, CCI has to only determine if allegations along with material produced are taken to be true, will that result in breach of competition law.
High Court Held
The High Court held that scope of interference of High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in an order passed directing investigation under section 26(1) is extremely limited. The CCI and authorities under Act, 2002 were well equipped to conduct the investigation and possess expertise in said field.
In view of the above, it was held that the High Courts could not interfere with such investigation unless there is an abuse of process and prima-facie it appears that the investigation was marred by mala fides.
It is only after the investigation/inquiry is completed and parties are given an opportunity of hearing that the CCI can decide whether the dispute is strictly commercial and raises no competition law concerns.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
