HC Sets Aside Order Denying Reasonable Opportunity to Assessee to Defend in Proceedings
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 26 April, 2023
Case Details: Ashok Singh v. State of Gujarat - [2023] 149 taxmann.com 398 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- N.V. Anjaria & Niral R. Mehta, JJ.
- Hiren J. Trivedi for the Petitioner.
- Aditya Pathak for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
A notice under Section 130 of CGST Act, 2017 was issued to petitioner calling upon him to remain present before authority on 15-10-2019. The petitioner appeared and submitted about pendency of petition under section 130. However, the authority passed order under Section 130 on 15-10-2019, i.e. on same date, confirming all proposals in GST MOV 10 regarding levy of tax and fine. It filed writ petition to challenge the order on the ground that order was passed without opportunity of hearing.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner was called to remain present on 15-10-2019 and he submitted before the authority that a petition was filed before the Court. However, the order under section 130 was passed on same date which resulted into denial of reasonable opportunity to petitioner to defend in proceedings.
Since, the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice, the Court held that the impugned order was liable to be set aside. The Court also remanded the proceedings to Competent Authority to decide matter afresh after giving opportunity to petitioner.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied