HC set-aside faceless assessment order as it was passed without issuing draft assessment order
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 July, 2021
Case details: Anju Jalaj Batra v. National E-Assessment Centre - [2021] 128 taxmann.com 165 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Manmohan and Navin Chawla, JJ.
- Salil Kapoor, S.K. Gambhir, C.S. Anand, Sumit Lalchandani and Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Advs. for the Petitioner
- Sanjay Kumar, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee was issued a notice under Section 142(1), to which assessee replied and furnished relevant details or explanations. Despite assessee’s replies, National e-assessment Centre (NeAC) issued an assessment order without issuing a mandatory draft assessment order or a show-cause notice. Revenue submitted that though no show cause notice-cum-draft assessment order was issued, yet several opportunities had been granted by NeAC to assessee to explain its case.
Assessee contended that the argument of revenue was contrary to the statutory scheme. Section 144B specifically provides for the issuance of a draft assessment order before the finalisation of the assessment. It further provides that assessment made under Section 143(3) or under section 144, on or after 01-04-2021, shall be non-est if such assessment is not made in accordance with the procedure laid down under this section.
High Court Held
On writ, Delhi High Court held that assessee was correct in submitting that Section 144B was violated. The assessment proceeding had been completed in violation of the principles of natural justice. Consequently, assessment orders issued under section 144 read with Section 144B as well as demand notice issued under Section 156 and notice for initiating penalty proceedings issued under Section 270A and Section 271AAC(1) were liable to be set aside. However, revenue was given liberty to pass a fresh assessment order in accordance with the law. Assessee was also given liberty to challenge any action of revenue in the event she is aggrieved by the same.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied