HC rejected plea for anticipatory bail of applicant as custodial interrogation required to unearth offences
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 29 September, 2022
Case Details: Suresh Hukmat Rai Jadhwani v. Union of India - [2022] 142 taxmann.com 524 (Bombay)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- N.J. Jamadar, J.
- D.S. Joshi for the Applicant.
- Jitendra Mishra, Ashutosh Misthra & Ms. P. N. Dabholkar for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The applicant received summons from the department and it was alleged that he was creating fake firms, issuing bogus invoices and availing ineligible ITC and passing same without supply of goods. It filed application for anticipatory bail and contended that it would be present before the authorities whenever called and co-operate during investigation.
High Court Held
The High Court observed that 21 fake entities have been identified during the investigation which were used to avail and further pass on ITC without the underlying transactions of sale and delivery of goods. The willingness of the applicant to cooperate with the investigation cannot serve the purpose of facilitating effective investigation and unearthing the fraud. Therefore, the Court noted that the allegations warrant custodial interrogation as fraud committed could not be brought on record without interrogation and the anticipatory bail application was rejected.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied