HC Rejected Condonation of Delay Plea on Ground that NR wasn’t Aware of Due Dates for Filing Returns
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 5 April, 2023
Case Details: Puneet Rastogi v. PCIT - [2023] 148 taxmann.com 362 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Manmohan & Ms Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
- Bhupinder Jit Kumar, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Ruchir Bhatia & Ms Mansie Jain Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee-individual, a non-resident, failed to file its return of income for the relevant assessment year. Even though the return of income for the earlier assessment year was filed a few years back, it contended that he was unaware of the due date or the process for filing the return of income. Subsequently, the assessee filed an application to condone the delay in filing the return of income and grant claim for refund, but the request was denied.
Aggrieved-assessee filed a writ petition to the Delhi High Court against such rejection.
High Court Held
The Delhi High Court held that ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Also, the assessee filed its return of income for the earlier assessment year within the time limit, implying that the assessee was aware of the process of filing the return of income. Therefore, it is seen that there is no genuine hardship or reasonable cause for the late filing of the return.
Thus, there had been no violation of the principles of natural justice, and ultimately the plea was dismissed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied