HC rejected bail application of tax consultant accused of generating fake invoices & huge tax evasion
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 January, 2022
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Sourav Bajoria v. Union of India - [2021] 133 taxmann.com 388 (Gauhati)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Hitesh Kumar Sarma, J.
- H.R.A. Choudhury, Sr. Counsel and S. Agarwal, Counsel for the Petitioner.
- S.C. Keyal, Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner-Tax Consultant was in custody for over a month for commission of offence under section 132 of CGST Act, 2017. The search was conducted in the office of the Tax Consultant and incriminating documents, such as E-way bills, invoices were found. It came out from the materials so far collected that he was arranging fake invoices. The petitioner filed bail application and submitted that being a Tax Consultant, he has no individual role in the commission of the offence & he had done his duty as a Tax Consultant only on the basis of the materials given to him.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court after considering the material placed of record observed that complaint alleged a huge economic offence and therefore, a thorough and detail investigation is essential. Further, the materials so far collected by the Investigating Agency in respect of manipulation of invoices etc., was clearly suggestive of his active involvement.
Considering the role of the petitioner in facilitating commission of the offence of huge tax evasion of Rs. 28,97,85,917/-, the enlargement of the petitioner on bail, at this stage, would likely to hamper the investigation and tamper evidence which may amount to compromising with the entire investigation of the case. Therefore, the bail application deserved to be rejected.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy v. Central Bureau of Investigation [2013] 7 SCC 439 (para 11).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
