HC rejected Anticipatory Bail considering gravity of offence as applicant was involved in fraudulent ITC claim
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 29 November, 2022
Case Details: Rajesh Kumar Dudani v. State of Uttarakhand - [2022] 145 taxmann.com 186 (Uttarakhand)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Ravindra Maithani, J.
- Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the Appellant.
- Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The taxpayer was engaged in providing manpower supply and was availing ITC in respect of the purchase of iron, plywood etc. Heavy load of goods was being transported through the vehicles having small load bearing capacity. The liabilities, in the initial stage, were majorly being discharged through cash, but later on, it was majorly being discharged through electronic credit ledger.
Further, the taxpayer was operating multiple firms out of which some of the firms were belonging to the related parties. The department contended that the taxpayer was engaged in generating fake and forged invoices so as to claim fraudulent ITC. The quantum of liability involved against the taxpayer was as huge as Rs. 393 lacs by the time. In the process of enquiry of the same, the taxpayer was not able to reply to the questions properly.
High Court Held
Hence, the High Court refused to grant the anticipatory bail by looking at the gravity of the offence i.e. the manner in which the taxpayer dealt with the questions, his non-cooperative behaviour and the quantum of the liability involved.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied