HC Quashes SCN As Only Summary of SCN Was Issued & No Date of Hearing Was Given to Assessee
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 29 January, 2024
Case Details: Alok Steel Industries - [2024] 158 taxmann.com 604
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Rongon Mukhopadhyay & Deepak Roshan, JJ.
- Sumeet Gadodia, Shilpi Sandil Gadodia & Ranjeet Kushwaha, Advs. for the Appellant.
- Aditya Kumar Pandey for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in the business of manufacturing Sponge Iron and M.S. Billet and was duly registered under the GST laws. For the period 2018-19, the petitioner was issued a Notice in Form GST ASMT-10, pointing out certain discrepancies in the return filed by it in GSTR-3B as compared to GSTR-2A. After the issuance of the said notice, the petitioner was issued a Summary of Show Cause Notice dated 27-09-2019 for wrongful availment of ITC.
Although no date for compliance with the said notice was intimated to the Petitioner, the petitioner filed its reply to the said notice. However, no proceeding and/or hearing whatsoever was undertaken by the authority. In the month of September 2023, for the first time, Petitioner was communicated Summary of the Order in Form GST DRC-07, which was uploaded in the GSTN Portal of the Petitioner and the Petitioner was imposed tax, interest and penalty for the alleged wrongful availment of ITC. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner filed a writ petition before the Jharkhand High Court contending that no opportunity of hearing was granted to him before the issuance of the order.
High Court Held
The High Court held that no opportunity of hearing was granted to the Petitioner before the impugned demand was raised upon the Petitioner. In view of the authoritative pronouncements of the Court, the Court quashed and set aside the Summary of Show Cause Notice and consequently set aside the adjudication order and the Summary of the Order.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied