HC quashes Benami proceedings initiated against AAP’s Minister Satyendar Jain; cites SC ruling

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • < 1 minute
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 17 October, 2022

Benami proceedings

Case Details: Jaladi Prasuna v. Union of India - [2022] 143 taxmann.com 188 (Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Yashwant Varma, J.

Facts of the Case

The Delhi High has quashed the proceedings initiated against Delhi Government Minister, Mr. Satyendar Jain under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.

High Court Held

The High Court has taken the reference of the Supreme Court ruling in the case of Ganpati Dealcom (P.) Ltd. [2022] 141 taxmann.com 389, wherein the apex court had declared retrospective operations of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 as unconstitutional.

The Benami transactions, from the proceeds of which certain attached assets were claimed to have been purchased by Mr Satyendar Jain, took place between 2011 and March 31, 2016. Accordingly, the amendment which came into effect by the Amendment Act, 2016 will not apply.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied