HC quashed provisional attachment order passed without indicating whether opinion is formed by Commissioner
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 1 April, 2022
Case Details: Sree Meenashi Industries v. Additional Chief Secretary/Commissioner of Commercial Tax - [2022] 136 taxmann.com 375 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- R. Suresh Kumar, J.
- Nithyaesh Natraj for the Petitioner.
- N.R.R. Arun Natarajan for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The search was conducted in the premises of petitioner. Thereafter, the Commissioner directed the bank authorities to attach the current account of the petitioner. It filed writ petition against the provisional attachment order passed by the Commissioner.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that the Commissioner has not followed mandatory guidelines issued by Supreme Court. The provisional attachment order was passed without indicating whether opinion was formed by Commissioner for passing such order and the tangible material was available before him so as to enable him to form such an opinion. Moreover, the objection cum appeal/application made by petitioner as against order of provisional attachment as contemplated under Rule 159 (5) were not considered. Therefore, it was held that impugned order can be construed as an order passed against dictum of Supreme Court and therefore, on that ground itself, was liable to be quashed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied