HC Quashed Assessment Order Due to Human Error in E-Way Bill
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 22 May, 2023
Case Details: Jena Trading and Co. v. CT and GST Officer - [2023] 150 taxmann.com 339 (Orissa)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dr. B.R. Sarangi & M.S. Raman, JJ.
- R.P. Kar, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Sunil Mishra, ASC, CT & GST for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a small dealer who generated a tax invoice for an amount of Rs. 1,97,047.86 but e-Way Bill was wrongly prepared wherein the total taxable amount was shown to be Rs.197047086.00. The department issued a notice but the petitioner didn’t file any response. Thereafter, the department passed an order under Section 74 for the cause of less filing of return for the period of 2019-20. It filed writ petition to challenge the assessment order passed by the assessing authority and contended that there was human error in generation of e-way bill.
High Court Held
The Honorable high Court noted that there was a palpable error in e-way bill, which could be construed to be a human error since Rs.1,97,047.86 was mentioned in tax invoice whereas in e-Way Bill it was mentioned as Rs.197047086.00. However, in the event the petitioner approaches the assessing authority, the assessment order can be reconsidered by the said assessing authority. Therefore, it was held that the assessment order was liable to be quashed and matter was to be remitted back to assessing authority for reconsideration in accordance with law.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied