HC Justified Cancellation of GST Registration As Assessee Uploaded Forged Documents At Time of Obtaining It

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 15 January, 2024

Cancellation of GST Registration

Case Details: Suresh Kumar Chaudhary v. Assisstant Commissioner - [2024] 158 taxmann.com 299 (Calcutta)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • T. S. Sivagnanam, CJ. & Supratim Bhattacharya, J.
    • Rajarshi Chatterjee for the Appellant.
    • Anirban RayMd. T.M. SiddiquiT. ChakrabortyS. Sanyal for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee was a proprietorship firm and engaged in the business of transportation. It applied for registration under GST and uploaded electricity payment receipt and rental agreement as proof of address and electricity proof of business premises. After due verification and field visit, the department found that the documents submitted by the assessee were forged and fabricated. Therefore, the department rejected the application for registration and issued a show cause notice for cancellation of registration.

The assessee did not respond to the notice and therefore, the registration was cancelled. Thereafter, the assessee filed application for revocation of cancellation of registration but the department rejected the application for revocation of cancellation of registration. It filed appeal before the Appellate Authority and the Appellate Authority passed order confirming the rejection of application for revocation of cancellation of registration. It filed writ petition against the rejection order and contended that the documents were genuine.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court noted that the registration was cancelled on the ground that the assessee had uploaded electricity payment receipt and rental agreement, which were found to be forged documents. The Court further noted that the Appellate Authority was well-justified in dismissing the appeal of assessee. Therefore, the Court held that there was no ground to interfere with the impugned order and the writ petition was liable to be dismissed.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied