HC Directed Petitioner to Make Fresh Application for Refund Since Refund was Rejected Without Reasons
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 August, 2023
Case Details: Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. v. Union of India - [2023] 153 taxmann.com 355 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Biren Vaishnav & Devan M. Desai, JJ.
- Bharat Raichandani, Anshul Jain & Aditya R. Parikh for the Petitioner.
- Raj Tanna & Priyank P Lodha for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner who was engaged in providing telecommunication services across India. There were instances where, excess payment of tax was made in the State of Gujarat. The petitioner applied for refund of excess tax after having made good the short payment of tax through the annual returns. However, the application for refund was rejected without assigning any reasons and it filed writ petition seeking relief from the High Court.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the order rejecting the claim for refund under Section 54(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 was without any reasons and it was evident from the text of the order itself. Therefore, the order rejecting refund was liable to be set aside and the Court directed the petitioner to make a fresh application for refund in terms of Circular No.125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019. The Court further directed the authorities to dispose of the same on merits in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied