HC Directed Dept. To Consider Representation of Assessee to Rectify GSTR-1
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 15 December, 2022
Case Details: T.M.C. - HI - TECH. v. Assistant Commissioner State GST - [2022] 145 taxmann.com 365 (Calcutta)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.
- Jagriti Mishra, Anup Bhattachharya, Subham Gupta, Debayan Goswami and Reshab Kumar for the Petitioner.
- Subir Kumar Saha and Bikramaditya Ghosh for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner filed GST returns and while submitting returns, certain inadvertent mistakes were committed. Due to these mistakes, some invoices were not available in GSTR-2A of recipient for which petitioner was advised to correct GSTR-1. But the petitioner was not getting access to online portal and it made requests to department authorities which were not replied by them. Therefore, it filed writ petition before the Court.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that certain entries of outward supply were shown in B2C instead of B2B column by the petitioner and said entries were not available in GSTR-2A of recipient. However, the department submitted that no decision on the petitioner’s representation has been taken as yet. Therefore, the Court held that department should consider representation to rectify GSTR-1 form of assessee and pass a reasoned order after hearing and the petitioner will also be at liberty to rely upon any decision of the Court of law at the time of hearing.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied