HC directed Competent Authority to decide applications for refund of unutilized ITC within a period of six weeks
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 18 January, 2022
Case Details: Medical Bureau v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax Delhi North - [2021] 133 taxmann.com 391 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Manmohan and Navin Chawla, JJ.
- Rajesh Mahna, Ruchir Bhatia, Ramanand Roy, Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Mayank Kouts, Shiva Narang and Akshay Bhatia, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Suhani Mathur, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in the business of purchase and exports of pharmaceutical products. The writ petition was filed seeking direction to the department to refund the amount of Rs. 1,35,30,255/-, being unutilized input tax credit for the months of October 2017 to July 2018 along with interest thereon. It submitted that the applications for refund of unutilized input tax credit were not disposed of for over 3 years.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that the petitioner ought to have been allowed 90% of the refund on Provisional basis and the remaining amount within sixty days as per section 54 sub-sections (6) and (7) of the CGST Act. The petitioner has made available all the details for processing of refund to the department and hence, there would be no reason or ground whatsoever for the department to sit over the refund of the petitioner and deny the same. Therefore, the Court directed the original Adjudicating Authority to decide the said refund applications within a period of six weeks in accordance with law.
Case Review
-
- Medical Bureau v. Commissioner of CGST [WP (C) No. 3917 of 2020, dated 10-11-2020] (para 9) followed.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Medical Bureau v. Commissioner of CGST [WP (C) No. 3917 of 2020, dated 10-11-2020] (para 9).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied