HC Denied to Issue Direction for Release of Seized Goods Due to Assessee’s Non-Compliance
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 18 April, 2023
Case Details: Adarsh Tobacco Co. v. State of U.P. - [2023] 149 taxmann.com 266 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Ashwani Kumar Mishra & Vinod Diwakar, JJ.
- Manish Gupta, Arjit Gupta & Naveen Chandra Gupta for the Petitioner.
- C.S.C. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a registered dealer under the GST and a survey was conducted by the department. During the survey, certain goods were found in the premises beyond the goods which were already disclosed by the petitioner and therefore, seized by the department.
The petitioner filed writ petition before the High Court for release of goods and contended that the request for release of goods was not considered by the department. The department submitted that the deposit made by the petitioner was not sufficient for the release of seized goods as the commodity which had been seized by the department was a perishable good.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the goods seized by the department are included within the definition of tobacco and, therefore, the seized goods would fall within the definition of perishable goods. However, the petitioner had not complied with requirement of release of seized goods i.e. perishable goods but instead follow wrong procedure of release of non-perishable goods.
The Court also noted that goods which are treated to be perishable would not be converted into non-perishable goods only because authorities have not acted in terms of rule 141(2) of CGST Rules by disposing off such goods. Therefore, the Court held that the petitioner having not complied with the requirement of release of seized goods i.e. perishable goods, would not be entitled to any direction for release of such seized goods.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied