HC can’t reproduce ITAT’s observation without giving its independent reasoning: SC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 March, 2022
Case Details: CIT v. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur - [2022] 136 taxmann.com 281 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- M.R. Shah and A.S. Bopanna, JJ.
- Balbir Singh, ASG Anil Katiyar, AOR S.K. Singhania, Manish Pushkarna, Shyam Gopal and Raj Bahadur Yadav, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Sanjay Jhanwar, Adv. and Tarun Gupta, AOR for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, the Assessing Officer (AO) has preferred an appeal before the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that while disposing of an appeal, the High Court can’t reproduce the observations made by the Tribunal. The High Court must give independent reasoning, and issues have to be discussed on merits.
Supreme Court Held
In the given case, going through and considering the judgment and order passed by the High Court, it was observed that such order was a mere reproduction of the Tribunal’s observations. The High Court gave no further independent reasoning, and nothing had been further discussed on merits, and even the substantial question of law had also not been framed.
Thus, the order passed by the High Court was quashed, set aside, and the matter was remitted to the High Court to decide and dispose of appeal afresh in accordance with law and on its own merits.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied