HC can’t interfere with finding of facts recorded by ITAT without specific question of law: SC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 5 January, 2023
Case Details: Muthoot Leasing and Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax - [2023] 146 taxmann.com 53 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sanjiv Khanna & M.M. Sundresh, JJ.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the findings of fact generally recorded by the ITAT are treated as conclusive. The High Court can interfere with the findings of fact while deciding a substantial question of law when the findings are not supported by the material on record, so as to be treated as perverse. For this, however, the High Court must frame a separate substantial question of law and only then interfere with the findings of fact by the ITAT, while applying the strict parameters.
Supreme Court Held
In the present case, the High Court did not frame a specific substantial question of law and thus, the interference with the findings of fact is unwarranted. Accordingly, the additions made by the AO and affirmed by the High Court are deleted and the order passed by the ITAT is affirmed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied