HC allows petitioner to rectify GST return error and directs the department to accept it manually
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 27 February, 2023
Case Details: Shiva Jyoti Construction v. Chairperson, Central Board of Excise & Customs - [2023] 147 taxmann.com 511 (Orissa)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dr S. Muralidhar, Cj. & M.S. Raman, J.
- Jagamohan Pattanaik, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Subash Chandra Mohanty Sr. Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the petitioner filed writ petition to permit the petitioner to rectify Form GSTR-1 filed for the period September, 2017 and March 2018 and allow correct reporting under B2B instead of B2C as few supplies were wrongly mentioned in B2C table. It was submitted that the error came to be noticed after the recipient informed about the above error on 21st January, 2020. However, it made several requests to department but no relief was provided.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that no loss would be occurred to department by permitting petitioner to rectify error and there was no escapement of tax. However, the petitioner would have been prejudiced if rectification was not permitted. Therefore, it was held that letters of rejection to be set aside and petitioner was permitted to resubmit corrected details in B2B under GSTR-1 and department was directed to receive it manually.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied