HC allowed petitioner to file TRAN-1 belatedly to claim CENVAT credit which was granted after winning appeal in 2018-19

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • 3 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 11 August, 2021

Recent Posts

Blog, Company Law

What is Terminal Value in Valuation – Definition | Approaches | Importance

Blog, Advisory, Company Law

[Analysis] SEBI Proposes Enhancements to the SME IPO Framework | A Detailed Overview of the New Regulations and Their Impact

Latest from Taxmann

TRAN-1 Form CENVAT Credit

Case details: Jahanpanah Club v. Union of India - [2021] 129 taxmann.com 10 (Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Manmohan and Sanjeev Narula, JJ.
    • Sumit K. Batra and Manish Khurana, Advs. for the Petitioner. 
    • Amit Bansal, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Vipasha Mishra for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner was issued show cause notices raising service tax demands on their operations/services. Due to lack of knowledge, CENVAT was not availed for the years 2012-13 to 2017-18 and the Adjudicating Authority permitted the petitioner to avail ITC for 2015-16 to 2017-18 only and rejected claim for previous years. However, it approached this Court and filed writ petition with contention that without order, on the merits mere rejection cannot be appealed. The Court directed to complete the proceedings and pass a reasoned order. The detailed order was passed rejecting the claim and it filed appeal.

On filing appeal against the order, it requested the CESTAT to allow adjustment against the CENVAT credit for payment of pre-deposit. But an objection was raised that the CENVAT credit was not carried forward from service tax to GST regime through the GST TRAN-1 form and since TRAN-1 Form was not filed, the entire amount of CENVAT credit will become redundant. It again filed this writ petition before the Court.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court observed that the CENVAT credit was granted pursuant to the order passed by the Commissioner dated 5th October, 2018 and the order dated 8th May, 2019 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), which is after the appointed date of July, 2017 when the GST regime came into force. The petitioner could not file Form TRAN-1 as the last date of filing the claim for credit expired on 27th December, 2017. Since, the delay in filing TRAN-1 Form could not be attributed to petitioner, the petitioner could not lose its vested right over accumulated CENVAT credit and, therefore, the department was directed to either open portal so as to enable petitioner to file TRAN-1 Form electronically or to accept a manually filed TRAN-1 Form.

Case Review

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied