Gujarat HC Direct GST Dept. to Pass Revision Order u/s 108 Against Cancellation of GST Without Giving Reasons
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 6 March, 2024
Case Details: Teszla Multi Trade v. Union of India - [2024] 159 taxmann.com 627 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Bhargav D. Karia & Niral R. Mehta, JJ.
- M. R. Bhatt, Sr. Adv., Avinash Poddar, Ms Anchal A. Poddar, Vijay Patel, Ms Manvi Damle, Deepak N. Khanchandani, Varis V. Isani, Aaditya D. Bhatt, Chetan K. Pandya, Shubham Jhajharia, Hasit Dave, Hiren Trivedi, Bhavesh J. Patel, Nirav P. Shah, Param V. Shah, Ashutosh Dave, Jyotindrasinh J. Vala, Prithu Parimal, Shrey H. Dave, & Ms Vaibhavi Parikh, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Chintan Dave, MS. SHRUNJAL SHAH, Assistant Government Pleader, Siddharth H. Dave, Ms Hetvi Sancheti, Sr. Standing Counsel, Nikunt K. Raval & Chirayu A. Mehta Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the petitioner filed writ petition challenging order of cancellation passed by GST authorities on ground that such orders did not contain detailed reasons for cancellation of registration of petitioner. It was contended that guidelines were issued to GST authorities to issue appropriate show cause notice containing all necessary details and information and to provide reasonable opportunity of hearing to tax payers.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the instructions were issued by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in the case of Aggarwal Dyeing to all field formations laying down procedure to be followed while dealing with subject of cancellation of registration. But, in the instant case, SCN and order of cancellation of registration did not contain any reason for cancellation.
Thus, the Court directed Competent Authority to issue notice with reasons and exercise powers under Section 108 for initiating suo motu revision so as to revise impugned order of cancellation of registration.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Aggarwal Dyeing & Printing Works v. State of Gujarat [2022] 137 taxmann.com 332/92 GST 82 (Gujarat) (para 3)
- Teszla Multi Trade v. Union of India [2024] 159 taxmann.com 222 (Gujarat) (para 6).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied