GST Registration Can’t Be Cancelled With Retrospective Effect If No Such Proposal Was There in SCN | Delhi HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 August, 2023
Case Details: Virender Kumar Jain v. Delhi GST Officer, Ward 76 - [2023] 153 taxmann.com 546 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Vibhu Bakhru & Amit Mahajan, JJ.
- Puneet Rai & Nikhil Jain for the Petitioner.
- Rajeev Aggarwal, ASG & Mahbher Mittal, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the petitioner applied for cancellation of his GST Registration on 20-11-2020 with effect from the said date on account of ill-health due to cancerous ailment. The department rejected the application. Thereafter, the department issued a notice dated 4-2-2021 to cancel the registration which petitioner failed to reply and the registration was cancelled with retrospective effect from 1-7-2017. It filed appeal for cancellation with retrospective effect but the appeal was rejected and it filed writ petition.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that SCN did not indicate that the concerned officer had proposed to cancel registration with retrospective effect. It also did not indicate that any inquiries were made, which revealed that petitioner had never existed at his declared place of business. The Court also noted that the petitioner had already applied for cancellation due to closure of business due to ill-health and therefore, the question of petitioner being available at principal place of business did not arise.
The Court further noted that this could not have been a ground for cancellation of petitioner’s GST registration that too with retrospective effect from date of its issuance i.e. 1-7-2017 without mentioning it in the notice. Therefore, the Court allowed the petition and it was held that the cancellation of petitioner’s GST Registration would be effective from 20-11-2020.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied