GST Council to resolve issue of transitional credit not reflected in Electronic Credit Ledger due to technical glitches: Madras HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 24 August, 2021
Case details: J. Saraswathiammal Powerloom v. Goods & Service Tax Council, New Delhi - [2021] 129 taxmann.com 183 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- N. Sudalaimuthu, for the Petitioner.
- R. Aravindan, G. Arjunan, Govt. Adv., V. Malaiyendran, Central Govt. Standing Counsel and K. Gokul, Central Govt. Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was dealers registered under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and after implementation of GST, it filed form TRAN-1 declarations. However, Input Tax Credit available to them was not carried forward in Electronic Credit Ledger. It filed representation before nodal officers and the matter was taken up for consideration by the IT Grievance Redressal Committee. But the department denied relief. It was submitted that since petitioner had not proved that failure to successfully upload was due to technical glitches in portal, petitioner could not be granted relief.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that the stand of Revenue was too narrow and technical, as, assessee could not be expected to have anticipated this requirement of collecting proof by way of screen shots and otherwise established factum of technical glitches. Therefore, it was directed to take up matter once again with GSTIN or Council and ensure that TNVAT credit available to petitioners was duly reflected in respective Electronic Credit Ledger of petitioners.
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Checkpoint Apparel Labeling Solutions India (P.) Ltd. v. CGST & CE [W.P. No. 3328 of 2020, dated 14-2-2020] (para 4)
- CGST & CE v. Checkpoint Apparel Labeling Solutions India (P.) Ltd. [W.A. No. 788 of 2020, dated 23-9-2020] (para 5).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied