Gratuity Amendment Act has no retro-effect; no exemption u/s 10 if enhanced gratuity received before 24-5-10

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 18 August, 2021

Payment of Gratuity Act

Case details: Krishna Gopal Tiwary v. Union of India - [2021] 129 taxmann.com 168 (SC)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Hemant Gupta and A.S Bopanna, JJ.

Facts of the Case

The ceiling of the gratuity was raised to Rs. 10 lakh w.e.f., 01-01-2007 in terms of office memorandum of Government of India dated 26-11-2008. Appellants were paid such gratuity in terms of such office memorandum. Later on, the Payment of Gratuity Act was amended by Central Act No. 15 of 2010.

The Amendment Act has finally enhanced the ceiling of gratuity from Rs. 3.50 lakh to Rs. 10 lakh. However, the Government of India has appointed 24-5-2010 as the date on which the Amending Act came into force.

The grievance of the appellant was that the tax had been deducted at the source when the gratuity was paid to the appellants before the commencement of the Amended Act. The amendment of the Gratuity Act was to grant liberalized benefits. Thus, amendments should be made effective from 01-01-2007 instead of 25-05-2010.

Supreme Court held

The Supreme Court of India held that the date of commencement fixed by the Executive in the exercise of the power delegated by the Amending Act cannot be treated to be retrospective as the benefit of higher gratuity is one-time available to the employees only after the commencement of the Amending Act.

What is exempt under section 10(10(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is the amount of gratuity received under the Gratuity Act. The Gratuity Act contemplated Rs. 10 lakhs as the amount of gratuity only from 24.5.2010. The cut-off date cannot be said to be illegal, it being a one-time payment. Therefore, such amendment in the Gratuity Act cannot be treated to be retrospective.

Accordingly, the benefit paid to the appellants under the office memorandum was not entitled to exemption in view of specific language of Section 10(10)(ii) of the Income-tax Act.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied