Goods Can’t Be Confiscated for Non-existence of Supplier Without Giving Purchaser Opportunity to Establish Bonafide Purchase | SC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 29 December, 2023
Case Details: Deputy Assistant Commissioner-1 (ST) v. Arhaan Ferrous and Non Ferrous Solutions (P.) Ltd. - [2023] 157 taxmann.com 649 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Mrs B.V. Nagarathna & Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ.
- Sahil Bhalaik, AOR Tushar Giri & Siddharth Anil Khanna, Advs. for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the department detained the goods of the petitioner on the ground that the consignor was not available at the given address. The petitioner filed writ petition against the detention of goods and the Honorable High Court directed provisional release of goods but gave liberty to the department to initiate independent action against petitioner under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017.
The department filed SLP against the order of High Court and contended that the goods were liable to be confiscated as the consignor was not available at the given address.
Supreme Court Held
The Honorable Supreme Court noted that the GST department could not have confiscated goods belonging to petitioner on account of absence of consignor at given address without giving petitioner an opportunity to establish bona fide purchase, as goods were duly covered under E-Way Bill and invoice. Therefore, it was held that the Apex Court was not inclined to interfere in matter and the SLP was dismissed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied