FEMA | No Prejudice Caused to Petitioner Due to Non-supply of Unreadable Damaged Documents

  • Blog|News|FEMA & Banking|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 13 July, 2023

Recent Posts

Blog, News, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Interim Moratorium Barred Continuation of Proceedings u/s 138 of NI Act Against Petitioner Due to IBC’s Overriding Effect | HC

Blog, News, FEMA & Banking

Borrower’s Right to Redeem Secured Asset Ends on Publication of Notice u/s 9(1) of SI Rules, Not After Sale Completion | SC

Latest from Taxmann

contravention of FEMA

Case Details: Mushtaq Ahmad Dar v. Enforcement Directorate - [2023] 151 taxmann.com 527 (HC-Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Sanjay Dhar, J.
    • M.A. Qayoom, Adv. for the Petitioner.
    • T.M. Shamsi, DSGI for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the respondent issued a show cause notice to the petitioner regarding the contravention of FEMA. The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) had, after considering the reply of the petitioner, framed an opinion that adjudication proceedings u/s 13(1) should be held against the petitioner.

The petitioner challenged the said communication, primarily, on the ground that the NCLT, without taking note of the request of the petitioner that he should be allowed to inspect documents relied upon by the respondent as the same was not legible, issued impugned communication/notice.

It was noted that certain documents available with the respondents were not legible as the same had been partly damaged in the floods of the year 2014. Therefore, even though the respondent was not in possession of legible copies of the said documents, as such, there was no occasion for the respondent to provide legible copies of these documents to the petitioner.

As a result, the petitioner’s argument that the principles of natural justice were violated by not furnishing these documents doesn’t hold good.

High Court Held

The High Court observed that even a perusal of the reply to the show cause notice filed by the petitioner clearly indicated that he effectively replied to each and every allegation made in the show cause notice and he had also responded to allegations, which were stated to be not legible.

Therefore, no prejudice had been caused to the petitioner by the non-supply of legible copies of the said documents which, in any case, were not available to the respondent themselves.

The High Court held that the impugned communication issued by the NCLT didn’t call for any interference and, thus, the instant petition challenging the said communication was to be dismissed.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied