Extraordinary Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Can’t be Invoked If Assessee Was Not Diligent in Availing Alternate Remedies | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 27 September, 2023
Case Details: Jitendra Kumar Pathak v. State of Bihar - [2023] 154 taxmann.com 525 (Patna)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- K. Vinod Chandran, CJ. & Partha Sarthy, J.
- Bachan Jee Ojha, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Raghwanand for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the writ petition was filed by the petitioner against the appellate order which was rejected on the ground of delay. The appellate order specifically noticed Section 107 of GST Act, 2017 which permits an appeal to be filed within three months and a further period of one month.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the Appellate Authority also took into account the saving of limitation granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court due to the pandemic situation. The Court further noted that invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 is not a measure to be employed where there are alternate remedies available.
In the instant case, the appeal was filed after 289 days from the date on which even the limitation period, as stipulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, expired. The petitioner had not been diligent in availing such alternate remedies within the stipulated time. Therefore, the Court held that this petition was liable to be dismissed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied