Exercise of Power u/s 63 Was Erroneous If Petitioner Was Already Registered Under GST Since 1-7-2017 | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 February, 2024
Case Details: Arupa Nanda Dhal v. Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal) [2024] 159 taxmann.com 684 (Orissa)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Dr B.R. Sarangi, ACJ. & Murahari Sri Raman, J.
- Sunil Mishra for the Appellant.
- Avinash Kedia for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was duly registered under GST Act since 1-7-2017, in spite of same, it was assigned temporary registration by authority with effect from 1-7-2021, on ground that sufficient reason were there to believe that petitioner was required to be registered under GST Act. The another reason appended was that as per data available with WAMIS (Works and Accounts Management Information System) pertaining to period 2019-20, the petitioner received revenue and an assessment order under section 63 was issued by authority. The appeal against said order was also rejected. It filed writ petition against the exercise of power under Section 63.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner got to know about the demand only when bank intimated attachment of account for purpose of recovery of demand raised in assessment framed under Section 63. The Court also observed that the Assessing Authority had earlier undertaken assessment under Section 74 and it was well aware of fact that petitioner had been granted registration under GST Act. Therefore, there was no scope for exercise of power under section 63 and thus it was held that exercise of power under section 63 was erroneous.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied