Duty Free Shops at Airports are Liable to Pay GST on Services Availed From Airport Authority of India | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 27 February, 2024
Case Details: Flemingo Duty Free Shop (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India - [2024] 159 taxmann.com 653 (Punjab & Haryana)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- G. S. Sandhawalia & Ms Lapita Banerji, JJ.
- V. Sridharan, Sr. Adv. Prakash Shah, Pawan Kumar Pahwa & Hrithik Chaudhary for the Appellant.
- Sourabh Goel, Chetan Mittal, Sr. Adv. Vivek Singla & Himanshu Gupta, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was operating duty-free shops at international airports and it had entered into a concession agreement with the Airport Authority of India (AAI) to operate these shops. The agreement stipulated that the company would pay a ‘licence fee’ to AAI. It was of the opinion that it wasn’t liable to pay GST on the licence fee since it was a duty-free shop.
The department was of the view that it was liable to pay GST on the licence fees but it can claim a refund. It filed writ petition against it but the divergent views emerged in 2 Judges division bench, with one judge proposing modification to require tax payment by petitioner, while another restrained petitioner from paying GST. The matter was placed before Hon’ble Third Judge.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court relied on the decision of Sandeep Patil v. Union of India 2020 (372) E.L.T. 794 (Bom.) and CIAL Duty Free and Retail Services Limited v. Union of India in CWP (C) No.12274 of 2020 where it was held that the operators of duty-free shops were exempt from GST on the sale of goods to passengers but liable to pay GST on the input services received.
The Court also pointed out that the concession agreement between the petitioner and AAI was clear and the petitioner was unequivocally obligated to pay GST on the services provided by AAI. Therefore, the Court directed the petitioner to reimburse AAI for the GST paid on its behalf, along with interest, as per the terms of the concession agreement. Thereafter, it can claim the ITC, and then apply for a refund of the accumulated ITC from the relevant tax authorities.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Sandeep Patil v. Union of India 2020 (372) E.L.T. 794 (Bom.) (para 19)
- CIAL Duty Free and Retail Services Limited v. Union of India in CWP (C) No. 12274 of 2020 decided on 22.09.2020 (para 22) followed
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied