Draft Order Sent to e-mail ID of Branch Office isn’t Justified If Notice Was Sent to e-mail ID of Assessee | HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 30 November, 2023
Case Details: Indian Bank vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - [2023] 156 taxmann.com 264 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- C. Saravanan, J.
- G. Baskar for the Petitioner.
- Ramana Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mrs Hema Muralikrishnan, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The specific case of the petitioner was that the designated E-mail ID was furnished by the petitioner for the purpose of e-filing and for receipt of notices. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) sent a notice and draft assessment order to the e-mail ID other than the designated e-mail ID of the assessee.
Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed a writ petition to the Madras High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that despite sending notices to certain email addresses of the assessee and making them available on the portal for the assessee to retrieve, there was inadequate information at the headquarters regarding the communication of the notice.
Merely because intimations were sent to one of the Branch Offices of the assessee, it was not sufficient for completing the assessment, particularly when notice under section 142(1) was earlier sent to the assessee’s correct e-mail ID, which was also responded.
Accordingly, the impugned order was set aside, and the case is remitted to the ITO to pass a fresh order.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied