Deputy RoC’s complaint against petitioner was quashed as a plea for violating sec. 165 was already filed for compounding
- Blog|News|Company Law|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 11 October, 2021
Case Details: Praveen Agarwal v. Deputy Registrar of Companies, Tamilnadu - [2021] 130 taxmann.com 462 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- M. Dhandpani, J.
- C. Arun Kumar for the Petitioner.
- D. Ramesh Kumar, Central Government Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the petitioner was a director in more than 20 companies at a time and thus, committed offence under section 165 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The Registrar of Companies, thus, issued a show-cause notice to the petitioner, for which the petitioner had sent a reply. In addition to the foregoing, the petitioner also filed an application under section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the compounding of the alleged offence.
High Court Held
Without considering the compounding application, the Registrar issued another show-cause notice and for which also petitioner had sent a reply to intimating pendency of compounding application.
However, without considering any of these aspects, for the alleged violation, Registrar filed the complaint before Competent Court. In fact, the complaint was not sustainable and thus, was to be quashed
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied