Dept. Erred in Denying ITC Transited From Pre-GST Regime as Section 174(2)(e) Preserves Pre-GST Legal Actions | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 8 January, 2024
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Tripati Ispat Udyog v. State of Jharkhand - [2024] 158 taxmann.com 124 (Jharkhand)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Rongon Mukhopadhyay & Deepak Roshan, JJ.
- Ms Amrita Sinha, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Ashutosh Anand for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the petitioner was engaged in the business of trading of Iron and Steel within the state of Jharkhand. It filed Form GST TRAN-1 within the prescribed time, transiting an amount of Rs. 26,81,541/- from the JVAT regime to GST regime. The FORM GST TRAN-1 was duly accepted by the GST department and amount was reflected in the electronic credit ledger of the petitioner.
Later, the petitioner received SCN under FORM GST DRC-01 for initiating proceeding u/s 73, 74, 122, 132(1)(d), 132(1)(a) of the CGST Act and it was alleged that the petitioner had not apportioned ITC as per the provisions of section 18(8)(xviii) of the Jharkhand VAT Act and thus not entitled to credit.
The petitioner filed writ petition and contended that initiation of the adjudication proceeding under GST was incorrect and summary notice without the issuance of a detailed SCN was void ab initio.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court observed that in the case of Usha Martin Limited [2022] 145 taxmann.com 224 (Jhar.), it was held that section 174(2)(e), saves any investigation, inquiry, verification, assessment, adjudication and any other legal proceedings as if these acts have not so amended or repealed.
Therefore, GST authorities were incorrect in assuming jurisdiction and initiating a proceeding under provision of CGST Act by alleging therein that ITC so transited from pre-GST regime was inadmissible under VAT regime.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
