Demand Order Passed Without Considering Reply of Assessee Was Liable to Be Quashed | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 2 November, 2023
Case Details: Daksh Enterprise v. Commissioner of State Tax - [2023] 155 taxmann.com 645 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Biren Vaishnav & Mrs Mauna M. Bhatt, JJ.
- Avinash Poddar for the Petitioner.
- Ms. Shrunjal Shah for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a partnership firm and a show cause notice/intimation in Form GST DRC – 01 was issued wherein, a demand had been raised against the petitioner for the financial year 2019-2020. It filed detailed reply but the authorities proceeded on an assumption that pursuant to the show cause notice, a response had to be filed on, or before 14-2-2022, which the petitioner did not file, and therefore, the order was passed. It filed writ petition against the demand order.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner was asked to submit his reply on, or before, 20-2-2022 and the detailed reply was duly filed on 19-2-2022. However, it was evident from the perusal of impugned order that it didn’t reflect consideration of the reply so filed and there was a clear violation of principles of natural justice. Therefore, the Court held the impugned order dated was to be quashed and set aside due to non-consideration of the reply.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied